Understanding Secondary Research Methodology Dissertation
The research methodology of a dissertation is an explanation of the techniques the student will use to conduct their study. There are two forms of examining the central problem of your paper—primary and secondary. The latter investigates various published literature on the subject as a mode of coming up with a comprehensive answer to the dissertation’s central question.
The secondary research methodology comes with numerous advantages and disadvantages. Understanding these two sides of the coin helps the student to make an informed decision on the direction of their paper. This article covers the merits and demerits to figure out what is best for addressing the topic.
The Advantages of Secondary Research Methodology
Dissertations are often expensive undertakings for students. The research involved may be involving and require traveling or securing equipment. Such purchases will drive up the cost of working on this project. A secondary research methodology is an inexpensive approach compared to the primary counterpart.
Sifting through a myriad of articles on your topic will not take up as much time as conducting primary research. Students should submit their dissertations before the deadline for completion elapses. Hence, a secondary approach will save you plenty of time that you would have spent going to the field to collect data. Additionally, the analysis and interpretation of primary data are time-consuming.
Using secondary research methodology in your dissertation makes the process of conducting the study more straightforward. You can find the necessary sources from school libraries and online academic repositories. Most schools provide their students with the required credentials to sift through various comprehensive databases on the internet. These resources make this kind of methodology accessible to many scholars.
The Disadvantages of Secondary Research Methodology
Academic literature often provides readers with the limitations of the individual studies. Of course, it may not be possible for research to cover all the nuances of a topic. As such, they define the scope of the examination to show the boundaries of the knowledge uncovered. Using these sources may be limiting for your dissertation as the overlooked areas may be relevant to your thesis.
Some of the academic literature you find may have relied on inaccurate data. Since you have no say in the strategies the researchers use, the quality may not be assured. Consequently, a secondary research methodology may make your dissertation invalid and unreliable if you have problematic sources.
Each publication you review in your secondary research methodology was contributing a unique perspective to our current understanding of the topic. Thus, the questions the researchers were trying to answer may not be relevant to your dissertation. This unreliability makes it difficult to formulate a well-researched solution to the problem you want to solve.
In conclusion, you should be guided by your topic and area of study to figure out the correct methodology to use. It would be best to delve deeper into what you want to solve to find a suitable approach for the dissertation. Make a point to seek clarification from your supervisor to help you with picking an effective strategy.